Re: Poplog common lisp meets the gcl random tester

[Paul F. Dietz]

Aaron Sloman wrote:

> However I don't know whether there is a real need for a free open source
> common lisp, as I am not really a user of lisp. (I would be if I did not
> have Pop11 !!)

There are several competing FOSS lisps aside from Poplog, actually; see

    http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation

and related pages.  I was testing poplog's CL mostly to exercise the random
tester.

	Paul