I thought it worth sharing this with pop-forum (and comp.lang.pop)
[originally sent to poplog developers list].
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, David Young wrote:
> You could just load LIB NEWRANDOM. As it's written entirely in Pop11 it
> should not cause these sorts of problems. It's also a reasonable
> generator statistically. It's relatively slow, but probably now faster
> than the assembly routine was when it was written.
To test this, I tried
lib newrandom
lib elizaprog
eliza();
....usual intro removed......
Good day what is your problem?
? do you like running on an amd64
DO YOU REALLY?
? do I really what
DO YOU OFTEN TALK ABOUT YOURSELF?
? I was trying to talk about running on an amd64
WHEN LAST DID YOU DISCUSS SOMEONE ELSE?
? Let's focus on your cpu
WHAT DOES THAT SUGGEST TO YOU?
? Your new cpu allows you to have big addressess
DO YOU LIKE USING LONG WORDS?
So it works!
Aaron
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~axs/
|